Allison, T., Ginter, H., McCarthy, G., Nobre, A.C., Puce, A., Luby, M., Spencer, D. (1994). Face Recgonition in Human Extrastriate Cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 821-825.

Allison, T., Puce, A., Spencer, D., McCarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception I : Potentials Generated in Occipitotemporal Cortex by Face and Non-face Stimuli.Cerebral Cortex, 9, 415-430.

Allison, T., Puce, A., McCarthy, G. (2002). Category-Sensitive Excitatory and Inhibitory Processes in Human Extrastriate Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2864-2868.

Andrews, T., Schluppeck, D. (2004). Neural responses to Mooney images reveal a modular representation of faces in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 21, 91-98.

Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Wang, W. (1995). ERPs differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 41-49.

Bentin, S., Moscovitch, M. (1988). The Time Course of Repetition Effects for Words and Unfamiliar Faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 148-160.

Bentin, S., Deouell, L., Soroker, N. (1999). Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. NeuroReport, 10, 823-827.

Bentin, S., Deouell, L. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-54.

Bentin, S., Golland, Y. (2002). Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces. Cognition, 86, B1-B14.

Bentin, S., Sagiv, N., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A., von Cramon, Y. (2002). Priming visual face-processing mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence.Psychologial Science, 13, 190-193.

Blaxton, T. (1989). Investigating Dissociations Among Memory Measures: Support for a Transfer-Appropriate Processing Framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.

Boehm, S., Sommer, W., Lueschow, A. (2005). Correlates of implicit memory for words and faces in event-related brain potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 95-112.

Bötzel, K., Schulze, K., Stodieck, S. (1995). Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of event-related potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 135-143.

Braeutigam, S., Bailey, A., Swithenby, S. (2001). Task-dependent early latency (30-60 ms) visual processing of human faces and other objects.NeuroReport, 12, 1531-1536.

Bruce, V., Young, A.W. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.

Bruyer, R., (1993). Failures of face processing in normal and brain-damaged subjects. F.Boller, J. Grafman (Eds.). Handbook of Neuropsychology,Vol.8, 411-435.

Buckner, R., Goodman, J., Burock, M., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D., Rosen, B., Dale, A. (1998). Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Object Priming in Humans Revealed by Rapid Presentation Event-Related fMRI. Neuron, 20, 285-296.

Burton, A., Bruce, V., Johnston, R. (1990). Understanding face recognition within an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361-380.

Caharel, S., Poiroux, S., Bernard, S., Thibaut, F., Lalonde, R., Rebai, M. (2002). ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1531-1544.

Campanella, S., Quinet, P., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., Guerit, J.-M. (2002). Categorical Perception of Happiness and Fear Facial Expressions: An ERP Study. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience, 14, 210-227.

Carmel, D., Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1-29.

Damasio, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H. (1990). Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 89-109.

Downing, P., Liu, J., Kanwisher, N. (2001). Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG.Neuropsychologia, 39, 1329-1342.

Duvernoy, H. (1999). The Human Brain. Surface, Blood Supply, and Three–Dimensional Sectional Anatomy. (2nd ed.). Wien / New York: Springer Verlag.

Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? NeuroReport, 9, 2945-2948.

Eimer, M., McCarthy, R. (1999). Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 10, 255-259.

Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition.Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 694-705.

Eimer, M. (2000a). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces.NeuroReport, 11, 2319-2324.

Ellis, A., Young, A., Flude, B. (1990). Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 495-512.

Farah, M., Wilson, K., Drain, H., Tanaka, J. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms.Vision Research, 35, 2089-2093.

Fodor, J., (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gabrieli, J. (1998). Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87-115.

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M., Anderson, A., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform ’face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects.NatureNeuroscience, 2, 568-573.

Gauthier, I. (2000). What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex?Trends inCognitive Sciences, 4, 1-12.

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M., Moylan, J., Anderson, A., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. (2000). Does subordinate-level categorisation engage the functionally defined fusiform face area?CognitiveNeuropsychology, 17, 143-163.

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J., Anderson, A. (2000a). The Fusiform “Face Area” is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level.Journal ofCognitiveNeuroscience, 12, 495-504.

Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K., Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.

George, N., Evans, J., Fiori, N., Davidoyff, J., Renault, B. (1996). Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 65-76.

George, N., Dolan, R., Fink, G., Baylis, G., Russell, C., Driver, J. (1999). Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 574-580.

Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T. (2000). Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1198-214.

Graf, P., Shacter, D. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal subjects and amnesic patients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501-518.

Grill-Spector, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 1-8.

Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., Kanwisher, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification.Nature Neuroscience, 7, 555-562.

Guillem, F., Bicu, M., Debruille, B. (2001). Dissociating memory processes involved in direct and indirect test with ERPs to unfamiliar faces.Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 113-125.

Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., Knuutila, J., Lounasmaa, O. (1993). Magnetoencephalography – theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 413-497.

Halgren, E., Raij, T., Marinkovic, K., Jousmäki, V., Hari, R. (2000). Cognitive Response Profile of the Human Fusiform Face Area as Determined by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 69-81.

Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Heit, G., Clarke, M., Marinkovic, K. (1994). Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 1. Depth recorded potentials in the human occipital and parietal lobes. Journal of Physiology, 88, 1-50.

Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. (1989). Recording and Interpretation of Cerebral Magnetic Fields. Science, 244, 432-436.

Hari, R. (1996). MEG in the study of human cortical functions. In A. Hashismoto, Y. Okada, S. Ogawa (Eds.), Visualization of Information Processing in the Human Brain: Recent Advances in MEG and Functional MRI, pp. 47-54. Amsterdam : Elsevier.

Hasson, U., Hendler, T., Bashar, D., Malach, R. (2001). Vase or Face? A Neural Correlate of Shape-Selective Grouping Processes in the Human Brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 744-753.

Hauptmann, B., Karni, A. (2002). From primed to learn: the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 313-322.

Haxby, J., Hoffman, E., Gobbini, I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.

Haxby, J., Gobbini, I., Furey, M., Ishai, A., Schouten, J., Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex.Science, 293, 2425-2430.

Haxby, J., Hoffman, E., Gobbini, I. (2002). Human Neural Systems for Face Recognition and Social Communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 59-67.

Henson, R., Shallice, T., Dolan, R. (2000). Neuroimaging Evidence for Dissociable Forms of Repetition Priming.Science, 287, 1269-1272.

Henson, R., Shallice, T., Gorno-Tempini, M., Dolan, R. (2002). Face Repetition Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests as Measured by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 178-186.

Henson, R. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70, 53-81.

Henson, R., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T., Otten, L., Quayle, A., Rugg, M. (2003). Electrophysiological and Haemodynamic Correlates of Face Perception, Recognition and Priming.Cerebral Cortex, 13, 793-805.

Henson, R., Rugg, M.D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263-270.

Henson, R., Rylands, A., Ross, E., Vuilleumier, P., Rugg, M. (2004). The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming.NeuroImage, 21, 1674-1689.

Hertz, S., Porjesz, B., Begleiter, H., Chorlian, D. (1994). Event-related potentials to faces: the effects of priming and recognition.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 342-351.

Herzmann, G., Schweinberger, S., Sommer, W., Jentzsch, I. (2004). What’s special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology, 41, 688-701.

Hoffman, E., Haxby, J. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception.Nature Neuroscience, 3, 80-84.

Horovitz, S., Rossion, B., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. (2004). Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing.NeuroImage, 22, 1587-1595.

Hoshyiama, M., Kakigi, R., Watanabe, S., Miki, K., Takeshima, Y. (2003). Brain responses for the subconscious recognition of faces. Neuroscience Research, 46, 435-442.

Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L., Martin, A., Schouten, J., Haxby, J. (1999). Distributed representation of objects in the ventral visual pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 9379-9384.

Itier, R., Taylor, M. (2002). Inversion and Contrast Polarity Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces.NeuroImage, 15, 353-372.

Itier, R., Taylor, M. (2004). Face Recognition Memory and Configural Processing: A Developmental ERP Study using Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reverted Faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 487-507.

Itier, R., Taylor, M. (2004a). Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects.NeuroReport, 15, 1261-1265.

Itier, R., Taylor, M. (2004b). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Differences between Object and Face Processing Using ERPs.Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.

Jacoby, L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects on an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.

Jemel, B., Calabria, M., Delvenne, J.-F., Crommelinck, M:, Bruyer, R. (2003). Differential involvement of episodic and face representations in ERP repetition effects. NeuroReport, 14, 525-530.

Jemel, B., Pisani, M., Calabria, M., Crommelinck, M., Bruyer, R. (2003a). Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable ? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 431-446.

Jemel, B., Schuller, A.-M., Cheref-Khan, Y., Goffaux, v., Crommelinck, M., Bruyer, R. (2003b). Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component.NeuroReport, 14, 2035-2039.

Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M., Kosslyn, S. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection.Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.

Joyce, C., Rossion, B. (2004). The effect of reference electrode on the N170/VPP complex in response to faces and non-face object categories.Program No. 525.8. 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience Meeting.

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., Chun, M. (1997). The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception.The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.

Kanwisher, N., Stanley, D., Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals.NeuroReport, 10, 183-187.

Kanwisher, N., Downing, P., Epstein, R., Kourtzi, Z. (2001) Introduction: The Modularity of Visual Recognition. In R. Cabeza und A.Kingstone (Eds.), The handbook on functional neuroimaging, pp. 109-152, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Koutstaal, W., Wagner, A., Rotte, M. Maril, A. Buckner, R., Schacter, D. (2001). Perceptual specifity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia, 39, 184-199.

Kress, T., Daum, I. (2003). Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia.Neuroscience Letters, 352, 133-136.

Leder, H., Bruce, V. (1998). Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.

Leder, H., Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.

Leveroni, C., Seidenberg, M., Mayer, A., Mead, L., Binder, J., Rao, S. (2000). Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. The Journal ofNeuroscience, 20, 878-86.

Lewis, S., Thoma, R., Lanoue, M., Miller, G., Heller, W., Edgar, C., Hunag, M., Weisend, M., Irwin, J., Paulson, K., Canive, J. (2003). Visual processing of facial affect. NeuroReport, 14, 1841-1845.

Li, L., Miller, E., Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918-1928.

Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Palva, J., Sams, M., Hietanen, J., Aronen, H., Ilmoniemi, R. (1998). Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magnetoencephalography. Neuroscience Letters, 253, 147-150.

Liu, J., Higuchi, M., Marantz, A., Kanwisher, N. (2000). The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport, 11, 337-341.

Liu, J., Harris, A., Kanwisher, N. (2002). Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.Nature Neuroscience, 5, 910-916.

Lu, S., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Lounasmaa, O., Sams, M., Vilkman, V. (1991). Seeing faces activates three separate areas outside the occipital visual cortex in man.Neuroscience, 43, 287-290.

Lueschow, A., Sander, Boehm, S., Nolte, G., T., Trahms, L. & Curio, G. (2004). Looking for faces - attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing. Psychophysiology, 41, 350-360.

Mammarella, N., Russo, R., Avons, S. (2002). Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and nonwords.Memory and Cognition, 30, 1238-1251.

Martin, A., Wiggs, C., Ungerleider, L., Haxby, J. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.

Martin-Loeches, E., Sommer, W., Hinojosa, J. (2005). ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 113-125.

McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Belger, A., Allison, T. (1999). Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception II : Response Properties of Face-specific Potentials Generated in Occipitotemporal Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 431-444.

Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L., Macko, K. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.

Mnatsakanian, E., Tarkka, I. (2004). Familiar-face recognition and comparison: source analysis of scalp-recorded event-related potentials.Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 880-886.

Morris, C. Bransford, J., Franks, J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.

Nunn, J., Postma, P., Pearson, R. (2001). Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? Neurocase, 7, 15-27.

Ostergaard, A. (1998). The effects on priming of word frequency, number of repetitions, and delay depend on the magnitude of priming.Memory and Cognition, 26, 40-60.

Paller, K., Grabowecky, M., Bozic, V., Yamada, S. (2000). Electrophysiological Correlates of Recollecting Faces of Known and Unknown Individuals. NeuroImage, 11, 98-110.

Pfütze, E., Sommer, W., Schweinberger, S. (2002). Age Related Slowing in Face and Name Recognition. Evidence from ERPs.Psychology and Aging, 17, 140-160.

Puce, A., Allison, T., Gore, J., McCarthy, G. (1995). Face-Sensitive Regions in Human Extrastriate Cortex Studied by Functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1192-1200.

Puce, A. Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J., McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 5205-5215.

Puce, A., Allison, T., McCarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. III: Effects of Top-down Processing on Face-specific Potentials.CerebralCortex, 9, 445-458.

Richardson-Klavehn, A., Bjork, R. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.

Robbins, R., McKone, E. (2003). Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?Cognition, 88, 79-107.

Roediger, H. (1990). Implicit memory: retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.

Roediger, H., McDermott, K. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller und J. Grafman (Eds.) Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol.8, pp. 63-131. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.

Rossion, B., Campanella, S., Gomez, C.M., Delinte, A., Debatisse, D., Liard, L., Dubois, S., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., Guerit, J.-M. (1999). Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study. ClinicalNeurophysiology, 110, 449-462.

Rossion, B., Delvenne, J.-F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., Guérit, J.-M. (1999a). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect : an event-related potential study.Biological Psychology, 50, 173-189.

Rossion, B., Gauthier, I. (2002). How does the brain process upright and inverted faces ?Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 62-74.

Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M., Crommelinck, M. (2002a). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses.Psychological Science, 13, 250-257.

Rossion, B., Joyce, C., Cottrell, G., Tarr, M. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.NeuroImage, 20, 1609-1624.

Rossion, B., Caldara, R., Seghier, M., Schuller, A.-M., Lazeyras, F., Mayer, E. (2003a). A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain, 126 (Pt11), 2381-2395.

Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Crommelinck, M. (2003b). The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces.NeuroImage, 19, 877-883.

Rossion, B., Caldara, R., Schiltz, C., Sorger, B., Roucoux, A., Mayer, E. (2004). The mid-fusiform gyrus is not a critical source oh the scalp face-sensitive N170 component: a double dissociation between electrophysiological and neuroimaging responses to faces in brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients. Program No. 258.5. 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience Meeting.

Rousselet, G., Macé, M., Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004). Animal and human faces : How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component ? Journal of Vision, 4, 13-21.

Rugg, M., Mark, R., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A., Birch, C., Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory.Nature, 392, 595-598.

Sagiv, N., Bentin, S. (2001). Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-based Processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937-951.

Sams, M., Hietanen, J., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., Lounaasma, O. (1997). Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex.Neuroscience, 77, 49-55.

Sander, T., Wübbeler, G., Lueschow, A., Curio, G., Trahms, L. (2002). Cardiac Artifact Subspace Identification and Elimination in Cognitive MEG Data Using Time-Delayed Decorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49, 345-354.

Sato, N., Nakamura, K., Nakamura, A., Suguira, M., Ito, K., Fukuda, H., Kawashima, R. (1999). Different time course between scene processing and face processing. A MEG study. Neuroreport, 26, 3633-3637.

Schacter, D.L., Chiu, C.-Y. P., Ochsner, K.N. (1993). Implicit Memory: A Selective Review.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 159-182.

Schacter, D., Buckner, R. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185-195.

Schweinberger, S., Pfütze, E., Sommer, W. (1995). Repetition Priming and Associative Priming of Face Recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 722-736.

Schweinberger, S. (1996). How Gorbachev primed Yeltsin: analyses of associative priming in person recognition by means of reaction times and event-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1383-1407.

Schweinberger, S., Pickering, E., Burton, A., Kaufmann, J. (2002). Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2057-2073.

Schweinberger, S., Pickering, E., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A., Kaufmann, J. (2002a). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 398-409.

Schweinberger, S., Huddy, V., Burton, M. (2004). N250r: A face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. NeuroReport, 15, 1501-1505.

Shanks, D., Wilkinson, L., Channon, S. (2003). Relationship Between Priming and Recognition in Deterministic and Probabilistic Sequnece Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 248-261.

Shibata, T., Nishijo, H., Tamura, R., Miyamato, K., Eifuku, S., Endo, S., Ono, T. (2002). Generators of Visual Evoked Potentials for Faces and Eyes in the Human Brain as Determined by Dipole Localization.Brain Topography, 15, 51-63.

Sommer, W., Komoss, E., Schweinberger, S. (1997). Differential localization of brain systems subserving memory for names and faces in normal subjects with event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 102, 192-199.

Sugiura, M. et al. (2001). Activation Reduction in Anterior Temporal Cortices during Repeated Recognition of Faces of Personal Acquaintances. NeuroImage, 13, 877-890.

Swithenby, S., Bailey, A., Bräutigam, S., Josephs, O., Jousmäki, V., Tesche, C. (1998). Neural processing of human faces: a magnetoencephalographic study. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 501-510.

Talairach, J., Tournaux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.

Tanaka, J. (2001). The Entry Point of Face Recognition: Evidence for Face Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534-543.

Tarr, M., Cheng, Y. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 23-30.

Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Salmelin, R. (2003). Category-specific activation during face perception in dyslexic individuals: an MEG study.NeuroImage, 19, 1194-1204.

Tarkiainen, A., Liljeström, M., Seppä, M., Salmelin, R. (2003a). The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1977-1992.

Tranel, D. Damasio, A. (1985). Knowledge Without Awareness: An Autonomic Index of Facial Recognition by Prosopagnosics.Science, 228, 1453-1454.

Trenner, M., Schweinberger, S., Jentzsch, I., Sommer, W. (2004). Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 388-400.

Ungerleider, L., Haxby, J. (1994). What and where in the human brain.Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-164.

Watanabe, S., Kakigi, R., Koyama, S., Kirino, E. (1999). Human face perception traced by magneto- and electroencephalography. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 125-142.

Watanabe, S., Kakigi, R., Puce, A. (2003). The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effet: a magneto- and electroencephalographic study.Neuroscience, 116, 879-895.

Wiggs, C., Martin, A. (1998) Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming.Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 227-233.

Williamson, S., Kaufman, L. (1981). Magnetic fields of the cerebral cortex. In S. Erne, H. Hahlbohm, H. Lübbig (Eds.), Biomagnetism, pp.353-402. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Winston, J., Henson, R., Fine-Goulden, M., Dolan, R. (2004). fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839.

© Die inhaltliche Zusammenstellung und Aufmachung dieser Publikation sowie die elektronische Verarbeitung sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung, die nicht ausdrücklich vom Urheberrechtsgesetz zugelassen ist, bedarf der vorherigen Zustimmung. Das gilt insbesondere für die Vervielfältigung, die Bearbeitung und Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronische Systeme.
DiML DTD Version 4.0Zertifizierter Dokumentenserver
der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
HTML-Version erstellt am: