Literaturverzeichnis

1. Daten des Gesundheitswesens - Ausgabe 1999, Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit, Band 122 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden , 1999

2. Gesundheitsbericht für Deutschland, Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Hrsg.: Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden Stuttgart, Metzler und Poeschel, 1998 S.159-168

3. Agresti, A.: Categorial Data Analysis, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1990 S.46

4. Alexandrov, A. V., et al: Measuring carotid stenosis, stroke, 24 (1993) S.1292-1296

5. Anson, J. A., et al: Surgical decision on the basis of magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries, Neurosurgery, 32 (1993) S.335-343

6. Barnelt, H., et al: Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, New York, USA: Churchill Livingstone, 1986, S.3-271

7. Barnett,H.J.M., et al: The uncertainties surrounding carotid endarterectomy, JAMA, 268 (1992) S.3120-3121

8. Bartylla, K., Huber,G.: Angiographic quantification of stenosis of the internal carotid artery, Radiologe, 35 (1995) S.801-807

9. Beduhn, D.: Value of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, Radiologe, 26 (1986) S.154-158

10. Blumenthal, E.: BT Elektrotechnik GmbH Ludwigshafen,

11. Bonita, Ruth: Epidemiology of stroke, lancet, 339 (1992) S.342-344

12. Boos, M., et al: Konventionelle MRA und CE-MRA der extrakraniellen Gefäßabschnitte, Radiologe, 37 (1997) S.515-528

13. Bornstein, Natan M., Norris, John W.: The unstable carotid plaque, stroke, 20 (1989) S.1104-1106

14. Bortz,J., Lienert; G.A.: Kurzgefasste Statistik für die klinische Forschung, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 1998

15. Brown, Martin, et al: Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study, lancet, 357 (2001) S.1729-1737

16. Canova, Corina R.: Wann muss eine Karotisstenose interventionell behandelt werden?, Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 130 (2000) S.1237-1243

17. Chiesa, R., et al: Three dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery surgery: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography, Eur J Vasc Surg, 7 (1993) S.171-176

18. Clifton, A.G.: MR angiography, Br Med Bull, 56 (2000) S.367-377

19. Cynthia, A., et al: Radiation exposure of personnel during digital subtraction angiography, cardiovasc intervent radiol, 11 (1988) S.108-110

20. De Marco, J.K., et al: Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography, Am J Roentgenol, 163 (1994) S.1205-1212

21. Derdeyn, Colin P., et al: Severe hemodynamic impairment and border zone-region infarction, Radiology, 220 (2001) S.195-201

22. Dix, J., Skrocki, J.: Evaluation of carotid stenosis by angiography: potential bias toward overestimated measurments intrduced by prior interpretation of Doppler sonogramms, Am J Neuroradiol, 21 (2000) S.639-642

23. Easton, J.D., Sherman, D.G.: Mangement of cerebral embolism of cardiac origin, Stroke, 11 (1980) S.433-442

24. Elergsma, O.E., et al: Multidirectonal depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three.dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography, Radiology, 216 (2000) S.511-516

25. Elgersma, Otto E.H., et al: Maximum internal carotid artery stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, Radiology, 213 (1999) S.777-783

26. Eliasziw, M., et al: Further comments on the Measurment of Carotid Stenosis from angiograms, Stroke, 25 (1994) S.2445-2449

27. European carotid surgery trialists group: Die Europäische Carotis-Chirurgie-Studie des Medical Research Council: Zwischenergebnisse bei symptomatischen Patienten mit hochgradiger (70-99%) oder leichter (0-29%) Carotisstenose, The Lancet, 10 (1991) S.497-508

28. European carotid surgery trialists group: randomised trial of enarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European carotid surgery trial, Lancet, 351 (1998) S.1379-1387

29. Furrer, M.: Kontroversen in der Behandlung der Karotisstenose, Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 130 (2000) S.1225

30. Gaa, J., Lehmann,K.-J., Georgi,M.: MR-Angiographie und Elektronenstrahl-CT-Angiographie, Stuttgart, Georg-Thieme-Verlag, 1999 S.3-66

31. Grebmeier, von J., et al: In-vitro-und Patientenuntersuchung mittels MRT: Bedeutung metallischer Implantate, Fortschr. Roentgenstr., 154 (1991) S.484-487

32. Griffiths, G.D., et al: Variability in measurment of internal carotid artery stenosis by Arch angiogramms and Duplex ultrasonography-Time for a Reappraisal?, Eur J Vasc Surg, 21 (2001) S.130-136

33. Gross-Fengels, W., et al: Komplikationen der IV-DSA - Ergebnisse bei 500 Patienten, Roentgen-BL., 40 (1987) S.281-285

34. Guggenmoos-Holzmann, I. , Wernecke, K.-D.: Medizinische Statistik, 1. Auflage Stuttgart, Blackwell Verlag, 1995 S.53-55

35. Günther, R.W., Thelen, M.: Interventionelle Radiologie, 2. Auflage Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag , 1999 S. 29

36. Hagen, B.: Invasive oder nichtinvasive Angiographie? Die Rolle der "klassischen" Katheterangiographie, Radiologe, 37 (1997) S.493-500

37. Heiserman, Joseph E., et al: Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, Radiology, 182 (1992) S.761-768

38. Hornig, C.R., et al: Hemorrhagic cerebral infarction-a prospective study, Stroke, 17 (1986) S.179-184

39. Inzitari, T., et al: The Italien Multicenter Study of reversible cerebral ischemic attacks: IV-blood pressure components and atherosclerotic lesions, Stroke, 17 (1986) S.185-191

40. Joarder, R., Gedroyc, W.M.: Magnetic resonance angiography: The state of the art, Eur. Radiol., 11 (2001) S.446-453

41. Johnson, Maria B., et al : Comparison of doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis, Clinical Radiology, 55 (2000) S.912-920

42. Kampmann, G.: Bildgebende Verfahren bei der Diagnositk der Karotisstenose: Ist die Angiographie veraltet?, Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr., 130 (2000) S.1231-1236

43. Katayma, Hitoshi, et al: Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media, Radiology, 175 (1990) S.621-628

44. Koenig, W.: Atherosklerose als inflammatorischer Prozess, Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 3 (100) 2003 S.105-111

45. Koller, R.L.: Recurrent embolic cerebral infarction and anticoagulation, Neurology, 32 (1982) S.283-285

46. Kuntz, Karen M., et al: Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients - is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis, J. Vasc. Surg., 22 (1995) S.706-716

47. Laster, Robert E., et al: Assessment of MR angiography versus arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease, AJNR, 14 (1983)

48. Laubenberger,Th., Laubenberger,J.: Technik der medizinischen Radiologie, 7. Auflage Köln, Deutscher-Ärzte-Verlag, 1999 S.S.355-371, S.434, S. 445-446

49. Leffers, A.M., Wagner, A.: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors, Acta Radiol., 41 (2000) S.204-210

50. Maas, R., et al: Risiken und Bildartefakte in der MRT (1,5 Tesla) durch metallische Fremdkörper, Fortschr. Roentgenstr., 147 (1987) S.365-374

51. Marmot, M.G., Poulter, N.R.: Primary prevention of stroke , The Lancet, 339 (1992) S.344-347

52. Masaryk, Anthony M., et al: 3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: Potential and limitations as a screening examination, Radiology, 179 (1991) S.797-804

53. Masuhr,K.F., Neumann,M.: Neurologie, 4.Auflage Stuttgart, Hippokrates-Verlag, 1998 S.S.355-373

54. Mayberg, Marc R., et al: Carotid endarterectomy and prevebtion of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis, JAMA, 266 (1991) S.3289-3294

55. Modaresi, K.B., et al: Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and dupls ultrsonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis, Br. J. Surg., 86 (1999) S.1422-1426

56. Motomiya, M., Karino, T.: Flow patterns in human carotid artery bifurcation, Stroke, 15 (1984) S.50-56

57. Müller, M., et al: Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery, Vasa, 27 (1998) S.24-28

58. NASCET collaboratos: Benificial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, N. Engl. J. Med. , 325 (1991) S.445-453

59. Nöldeke, H.-A., et al : Klinische Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der zwei-und dreidimesionalen Time-of-Flight MR-Angiographie in der Diagnostik der Karotisstenose, Fortschr. Roentgenstr., 157 (1992) S.566-572

60. Oberholzer, K., et al: Kontrastverstärkte dreidimensionale MR-Angiographie der A. carotis bei 1,0 Tesla im Vergleich zur i.a. DSA - Ist die Methode für die Diagnostik von Karotisstenosen geeignet? , Fortschr. Roentgenstr., 173 (2001) S.350-355

61. Patel, Mahesh R., et al: Preoperative assessment of carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance and duplex ultrsonography replace contrast arteriography? , Stroke , 26 (1995) S.1753-1758

62. Patel, Mahesh R., et al: MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations, Am. J. Roentgenol., 162 (1994) S.1431-1437

63. Pavlicek, William, et al: The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance on patients with cardiac pacemakers, Radiology, 147 (1983) S.149-153

64. Petersen, D., Klose, U.: Indikationen zur Kontrastmittlegabe bei der MR-Angiographie der Hirngefäße, Radiologe, 37 (1997) S.508-514

65. Prange, H., Bitsch, A.: Notfallbuch Neurologie, 1. Auflage Stuttgart, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2002 S.183-202

66. Ross, R.: The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis - an update, N. Engl. J. Med., 314 (1986) S.488-500

67. Rothwell, Peter M., et al: Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiogramms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, Stroke, 31 (2000-I) S.615-621

68. Rothwell, Peter M., et al: Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotis stenosis, Stroke, 25 (1994-I) S.2440-2444

69. Rothwell, Peter M., et al: Equivalence of measurements of carotis stenosis , Stroke, 25 (1994-II) S.2435-2439

70. Rothwell, Peter M., et al: Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: Systematic review, BMJ, 315 (1997) S.1571-1577

71. Rothwell, Peter M., Warlow, Charles P.: Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotis stenosis, Stroke, 31 (2000-II) S.622-630

72. Rothwell, Peter M., Warlow, Charles P.: Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: A risk-modelling study, The Lancet, 353 (1999) 2105-2110

73. Sachs, L.: Angewandte Statistik, 8. Auflage Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1991 S.472

74. Samuels, Owen B., et al: A standardized method for measuring intrcranial arterial stenosis, Am.J. Neuroradiol., 21 (2000) S.643-646

75. Schuhmacher, M.: Conscientia diagnostica, 1. Auflage Konstanz, Schnetztor-Verlag GmbH, 1988 S.S.68, S.90, S.144-149

76. Schulz, U. G., Rothwell Peter M:: Major variation in carotid bifurcation anatomy: a possible risk factor for carotid plaque development?, Stroke, 32 (2001-II) S.2522-2529

77. Schulz, U. G., Rothwell, Peter M.: Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy and the distribution of atherosclerotic plaque, Stroke, 32 (2001-I) S.1525-1531

78. Stehling, M.K., et al: Kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie. Theorie, Technik und praktische Durchführung, Radiologe, 501-507 37 (1997)

79. Tell, G. S. , et al: Relation of smoking with carotid artery wall thickness and stenosis in older adults. The cardiovascular health study, Circulation, 90 (1994) S.2905-2908

80. Toole, James F. et al: Study design for randomized prospective trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic artherosclerosis, stroke, 20 (1989) S.844-849

81. Toole, James F., Castaldo, John E.: Accurate measurement of caotid stenosis, J. Neuroimaging, 4 (1994) S.222-229

82. Trampisch,H.J., Windeler,J.: Medizinische Statistik, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 1997

83. Vanninen, R.L., et al: Carotid stenosis by digital subtraction angiography: reproducibility of the European Carotid Surgery Trial and the North American Sypmtomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement methods and visual interpretation, Am. J. Neuroradiol., 15 (1994) S.1635-1641

84. Vanninen, R.L., et al: How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?, Neuroradiology, 38 (1996) S.299-305

85. Waugh, John R., Sacharias, Nina: Arteriographic complications in the DSA era, Radiology, 182 (1992) S.243-246

86. WHO MONICA project: The World Health Organisation MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 41 (1988) S.105-114

87. Wintersperger, B.J., et al: MR-angiographie der supraortalen Gefäße , Radiologe, 40 (2000) S.785-791

88. Zeitler, E., et al: The value of angiography in cerebrovascular disease, Thorac. cardiovasc. Surgeon, 37 (1998) S.259-263