The Influence of Task Instructions on  Action Coding: Response Instruction and Response CodingDorit Wenke1123456272.189102.21112532#3861314151617318193.13.1.12021222324253.1.2262728293.1.3303132333.1.434The Manual Stroop Task35363738The Hedge and Marsh Task394041530#324424344Response Instructions and Spatial vs. Non-Spatial Irrelevant Stimulus Effects4546473.1.548495051523.253545556573.35859606162463644.1654.1.1ParticipantsApparatus and Stimuli66Design and Procedure674.1.2Data Analysis6869Main Results70Additional Analyses71538#43372540#436 Practice73744.1.375764.2774.2.1ParticipantsApparatus and StimuliDesign and Procedure784.2.2Data Analysis79Main Results80Additional Analyses81533#43482473#386Practice83844.2.3854.3864.3.1ParticipantsApparatus and StimuliDesign and Procedure4.3.2Data Analysis87Main Results88 Comparisons between Experiments8990Additional Analyses91480#38692480#379 Practice9394954.3.3964.4979899747#70510010110210351041055.11061075.1.1ParticipantsStimulus Material and Counterbalancing108109 Apparatus and Procedure1101115.1.2Data Analysis112113Main Results114Additional Analyses457#4061155.1.31161171185.21195.2.1ParticipantsStimulus Material and Counterbalancing120Apparatus and Procedure1215.2.2Data AnalysisMain Results122 Additional Analyses123504#4451245.2.31255.3126127561#5611281291306131132133134135640#488136137138139140 7 References141List of AbbreviationsAcknowledgementsenTable of contentsHelp 7 References [1] Allport, A. (1993): Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions?, Meyer, D.E. and Kornblum, S., Eds, Attention and Performance XIV, pp. 183-218, MIT Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [2] Alluisi, E. A. and Warm, J. S. (1990): Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response and related effects, Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds, Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, pp. 3-30, North Holland,

Amsterdam

. [3] Azuma, R.; Prinz, W. and Koch, I. (in press): Dual-task slowing and the effect of cross-task compatibility, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A). [4] Barber, P. and O'Leary, M. (1997): The relevance of salience: Towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects, Hommel, B. and Prinz, W., Eds, Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, pp. 135-172, Elsevier,

Amsterdam

. [5] Barsalou, L. W. (1999): Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, pp.577-660. [6] Bashore, T. R. (1990): Stimulus-response compatibility viewed from a cognitive psychophysiological perspective, Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds, Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, pp. 183-223, North Holland,

Amsterdam

. [7] Beckers, T.; De Houwer, J. and Eelen, P. (2002): Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 66, pp.166-173. [8] Botwinick, M. M.; Braver, T. S.; Barch, D. M.; Carter, C. S. and Cohen, J. D. (2001): Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychological Review 108, pp.624-652. [9] Brebner, J. (1979): The compatibility of spatial and non-spatial relationships, Acta Psychologica 43, pp.23-32. [10] Broadbent, D. E. and Gregory, M. (1962): Donders' B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility, Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, pp.575-578. [11] Clark, H. H. (1973): The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, pp.335-359. [12] Cohen, J. D.; Dunbar, K. and McClelland, J. L. (1990): On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect, Psychological Review 97, pp.332-361. [13] Cohen, J. D.; Braver, T. S. and O'Reilly, R. (2000): A computational approach to prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and schizophrenia: Recent developments and current challenges, Roberts, A. C.; Robbins, T. W. and Weiskrantz, L., Eds, The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions, pp. 195-220, Oxford University Press,

Oxford

. [14] De Houwer, J. and Eelen, P. (1998): An affective variant of the Simon paradigm, Cognition and Emotion 12, pp.45-61. [15] De Jong, R.; Liang, C. C. and Lauber, E. (1994): Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, pp.731-750. [16] Duncan, J.; Emslie, H.; Williams, P.; Johnson, R. and Freer, P. (1996): Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior, Cognitive Psychology 30, pp.257-303. [17] Eimer, M.; Nattkemper, D.; Schröger, E. and Prinz, W. (1996): Involuntary Attention, Neuman, O. and Sanders, A.F., Eds, Handbook of Perception and Action 3, pp. 113-153, Academic Press,

San Diego, CA

. [18] Elsner, B. and Hommel, B. (2001): Effect anticipation and action control, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27, pp.229-240. [19] Emerson, M.J. and Miyake, A. (2003): The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation, Journal of Memory and Language 48, pp.148-168. [20] Glaser, W. R. and Glaser, M. O. (1989): Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118, pp.13-42. [21] Goschke, T. (2000): Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching, Monsell, S. and Driver, J., Eds, Attention and Performance XVIII, pp. 331-355, MIT Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [22] Guiard, Y. (1983): The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses, Journal of Motor Behavior 15, pp.331-342. [23] Hasbroucq, T. and Guiard, Y. (1991): Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17, pp.246-266. [24] Hedge, A. and Marsh, N. W. A. (1975): The effects of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response time, Acta Psychologica 39, pp.427-439. [25] Heister, G.; Schroeder-Heister, P. and Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990): Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility, Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds, Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, pp. 117-143, North Holland,

Amsterdam

. [26] Hommel, B. (1993a): Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 55, pp.270-279. [27] Hommel, B. (1993b): The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for temporal overlap, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 55, pp.280-290. [28] Hommel, B. (1995): Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, pp.764-775. [29] Hommel, B. (1996a): No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes, Perception and Psychophysics 58, pp.102-110. [30] Hommel, B. (1996b): The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects., Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 59, pp.176-186. [31] Hommel, B. (1996c): S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A, pp.546-571. [32] Hommel, B. (1997): Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibilitiy, Hommel, B. and Prinz, W., Eds, Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, pp. 281-330, Elsevier,

Amsterdam

. [33] Hommel, B. (1998): Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, pp.1368-1384. [34] Hommel, B. (2000): The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation, Monsell, S. and Driver, J., Eds, Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes, pp. 247-273, MIT Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [35] Hommel, B.; Müsseler, J.; Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001): The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, pp.849-878. [36] Hommel, B. and Eglau, B. (2002): Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 66, pp.260-273. [37] Hommel, B.; Alonso, D. and Fuentes, L. J. (in press): Acquisition and generalization of action effects, Visual Cognition. [38] Hommel, B.; Proctor, R. W. and Vu, K.-P. L. (in press): A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung. [39] Hommel, B. (submitted for publication): Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung. [40] Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983): Mental models, Wanner, E., Ed, Cognitive Science Series, Harvard University Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [41] Johnson-Laird, P.N.; Chaffin, R. and Herrmann, D.J. (1984): Only connections: A critique of semantic networks, Psychological Bulletin 2, pp.292-315. [42] Johnson-Laird, P. N.; Byrne, R. M. and Schaeken, W. (1992): Propositional reasoning by model, Psychological Review 99, pp.418-439. [43] Keele, S. W. (1972): Attention demands of memory retrieval, Journal of Experimental Psychology 93, pp.245-248. [44] Keele, S.W.; Cohen, A. and Ivry, R. (1990): Motor programs: Concepts and issues, Jeannerod, M., Ed, Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control, pp. 77-110, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,

Hillsdale, NJ

. [45] Koch, I. and Prinz, W. (2002): Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, pp.192-201. [46] Koch, I. and Kunde, W. (in press): Verbal response-effect compatibility, Memory and Cognition. [47] Koch, I. and Prinz, W. (submitted for publication): Response preparation and code overlap in dual tasks. [48] Kornblum, S.; Hasbroucq, T. and Osman, A. (1990): Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility - A model and taxonomy, Psychological Review 97, pp.253-270. [49] Kornblum, S. and Lee, J.-W. (1995): Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, pp.855-875. [50] Kornblum, S.; Stevens, G. T.; Requin, J. and Whipple, A. (1999): The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25, pp.688-714. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~kornblum/compatibility.html [1] Kunde, W. (2001): Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27, pp.387-394. [2] Kunde, W.; Kiesel, A. and Hoffmann, J. (2003): Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition, Cognition 88, pp.223-242. [3] Lien, M.-C. and Proctor, R. W. (2000): Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, pp.1260-1280. [4] Lien, M.-C. and Proctor, R. W. (2002): Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory effects: Implications for response selection, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, pp.212-238. [5] Lien, M.-C.; Schweickert, R. and Proctor, R. W. (2003): Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory paradigm, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, pp.692-712. [6] Logan, G. D. and Schulkind, D. (2000): Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, pp.1072-1090. [7] Logan, G. D. and Gordon, R. D. (2001): Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations, Psychological Review 108, pp.393-434. [8] Lu, C.-H. and Proctor, R. W. (1994): Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, pp.286-298. [9] Lu, C.-H. and Proctor, R.W. (1995): The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2, pp.174-207. [10] Lu, C.-H. (1997): Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the stimulus-response relations and the processing dynamics, Hommel, B. and Prinz, W., Eds, Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, pp. 85-117, Elsevier,

Amsterdam

. [11] Lu, C.-H. and Proctor, R. W. (2001): Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: Effects of S-R association strength and relative timing, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A, pp.95-136. [12] Luria, A.R. (1961): The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior, Liveright Publishing Corporation,

New York

. [13] MacLeod, C. (1991): Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review, Psychological Bulletin 109, pp.163-203. [14] Magen, H. and Cohen, A. (2002): Action-based and vision-based selection of input: Two sources of control, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 66, pp.247-259. [15] Mattes, S.; Leuthold, H. and Ulrich, R. (2002): Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A, pp.1175-1191. [16] McClain, L. (1983): Effect of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance, Perceptual and Motor Skills 56, pp.735-743. [17] Meiran, N. (2000): Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching, Monsell, S. and Driver, J., Eds, Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes, pp. 377-399, MIT Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [18] Meiran, N. (2001): Event coding, executive control, and task-switching, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, pp.893-894. [19] Milliken, B.; Joordens, S.; Merikle, P.M. and Seiffert, A.E. (1998): Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming, Psychological Review 105, pp.203-229. [20] Monsell, S. (1996): Control of mental processes, Bruce, V., Ed, Unsolved mysteries of the mind, pp. 93-148, Erlbaum,

Hove, U.K.

. [21] Nicoletti, R. and Umiltà, C. (1984): Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility, Perception and Psychophysics 35, pp.333-343. [22] Nicoletti, R. and Umiltà, C. (1985): Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present, Perception and Psychophysics 38, pp.211-216. [23] Nicoletti, R.; Umiltà, C.; Tressoldi, E. P. and Marzi, C. A. (1988): Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?, Perception and Psychophysics 43, pp.287-292. [24] Nosofsky, R. M.; Clark, S. E. and Shin, H. J. (1989): Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, pp.282-304. [25] O'Reilly, R. C.; Braver, T. S. and Cohen, J. D. (1999): A biologically based computational model of working memory, Miyake, A. and Shah, P., Eds, Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, pp. 375-411, Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge

. [26] O'Reilly, R. C. and Soto, R. (2002): A model of the phonological loop: Generalization and binding, Dietterich, T. G.; Becker, S. and Ghahramani, Z., Eds, Advances in Neural Information processing Systems (NIPS) 14, MIT Press,

Cambridge, MA

. [27] Pashler, H. (1994): Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory, Psychological Bulletin 16, pp.220-224. [28] Phaf, R. H.; Van der Heijden, A. H. C. and Hudson, P. T. W. (1990): SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks, Cognitive Psychology 22, pp.273-341. [29] Prinz, W.; Tweer, R. and Feige, R. (1974): Context control of search behavior: Evidence from a 'hurdling' technique, Acta Psychologica 38, pp.72-80. [30] Pritchatt, D. (1968): An investigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20, pp.351-359. [31] Proctor, R. W. and Lu, C.-H. (1999): Processing irrelevant information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks, Memory & Cognition 27, pp.63-77. [32] Proctor, R. W.; Vu, K.-P. L. and Nicoletti, R. (2002): A prevalence effect for two-dimensional stimulus-response sets when location is irrelevant?, 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society,

Kansas City, MO

. [33] Proctor, R. W. and Pick, D. F. (2003): Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect, Acta Psychologica 112, pp.259-278. [34] Ratcliff, R. (1993): Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers, Psychological Bulletin 114, pp.510-532. [35] Redding, G. M. and Gerjets, D. A. (1977): Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses, Perceptual and Motor Skills 45, pp.11-17. [36] Rogers, R. D. and Monsell, S. (1995): Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124, pp.207-231. [37] Roswarski, T. E. and Proctor, R. W. (2000): Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: Is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 63, pp.148-158. [38] Roswarski, T. E. and Proctor, R. W. (2003a): The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 67, pp.43-55. [39] Roswarski, T. E. and Proctor, R. W. (2003b): Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect. Comment on Wascher et al. (2001), Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, pp.152-158. [40] Schuch, S. and Koch, I. (submitted for publication): The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks, p.xxx. [41] Sharma, D. and McKenna, F. P. (1998): Differential components of the manual and verbal Stroop tasks, Memory & Cognition 26, pp.1033-1040. [42] Shiu, L.-P. and Kornblum, S. (1999): Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: A dimensional overlap account, Perception and Psychophysics 61, pp.1613-1623. [43] Simon, J. R. (1969): Reactions toward the source of stimulation, Journal of Experimental Psychology 81, pp.174-176. [44] Simon, J. R.; Hinrichs, J. V. and Craft, J. L. (1970): Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence, Journal of Experimental Psychology 86, pp.97-102. [45] Simon, J. R.; Acosta, E.; Mewaldt, S. P. and Speidel, C. R. (1976): The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages in processing, Perception and Psychophysics 19, pp.16-22. [46] Simon, J. R. and Sudalaimuthu, P. (1979): Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5, pp.176-187. [47] Simon, J. R.; Sly, P. E. and Vilapakkam, S. (1981): Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reaction toward the stimulus source, Acta Psychologica 47, pp.63-81. [48] Simon, J. R. (1990): The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing, Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds, Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, pp. 183-223, North Holland,

Amsterdam

. [49] Smith, P. and Brebner, J. (1983): S-R compatibility: The relative effects of "relevant" spatial and non-spatial variables, Australian Journal of Psychology 35, pp.1-10. [50] Stroop, J. R. (1935): Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions, Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, pp.643-662. [1] Stürmer, B.; Leuthold, H.; Soetens, H.; Schröter, H. and Sommer, W. (2002): Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, pp.1345-1363. [2] Sugg, M. J. and McDonald, J. E. (1994): Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, pp.647-675. [3] Tagliabue, M.; Zorzi, M.; Umiltà, C. and Bassignani (2000): The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, pp.648-670. [4] Umiltà, C. and Nicoletti, R. (1990): Spatial stimulus-response compatibility, Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G., Eds, Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, pp. 89-116, Elsevier,

Amsterdam

. [5] Umiltà, C. (1991): Problems for the salient-features coding hypothesis: Comment on Weeks and Proctor, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120, pp.83-86. [6] Valle-Inclán, F. (1996): The Simon effect and its reversal studied with event-related potentials, International Journal of Psychophysiology 23, pp.41-53. [7] Valle-Inclán, F. and Redondo, M. (1998): On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect, Psychophysiology 35, pp.366-371. [8] Virzi, R. A. and Egeth, H. E. (1985): Toward a translational model of Stroop interference, Memory & Cognition 13, pp.304-319. [9] Vu, K.-P. L.; Proctor, R. W. and Pick, D. F. (2000): Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses, Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung 64, pp.25-40. [10] Vu, K.-P. L. and Proctor, R. W. (2001): Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, pp.813-828. [11] Vu, K.-P. L. and Proctor, R. W. (2002): The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions, Perception and Psychophysics 64, pp.815-828. [12] Wallace, R. J. (1971): S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code, Journal of Experimental Psychology 88, pp.354-360. [13] Wang, D.-Y. ; Proctor, R. W. and Pick, D. F. (2002): The Simon effect with wheel rotation response, 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society,

Kansas City, MO

. [14] Wascher, E.; Schatz, U.; Kuder, T. and Verleger, Rolf (2001): Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27, pp.731-751. [15] Watter, S. and Logan, G. (2001): Parallel response-selection in dual-task situations, 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society,

Orlando, Florida

. [16] Wenke, D. and Frensch, P. A. (2000): From instruction to action, 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society,

New Orleans, Louisiana

. [17] White, B. W. (1969): Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names, Perception and Psychophysics 6, pp.166-168. [18] Worringham, C. J. and Kerr, G. K. (2000): Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A, pp.69-83. [19] Zhang, J. and Kornblum, S. (1997): Distributional Analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) Dual-Process model of the Simon effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, pp.1543-1551. [20] Zhang, H.; Zhang, J. and Kornblum, S. (1999): A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility, Cognitive Psychology 38, pp.386-432. [21] Zhang, H. (2000): The Simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: Evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, pp.1018-1037. [22] Ziessler, M. and Nattkemper, D. (2002): Effect anticipation in action planning, Prinz, W. and Hommel, B., Eds, Attention and Performance XIX, pp. 645-672, Oxford University Press,

Oxford

.