|edoc-Server der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin|
Güzin Bayraksan, The University of Texas at Austin|
David P. Morton, The University of Texas at Austin
|Title:||Assessing Solution Quality in Stochastic Programs|
|Date of Acceptance:||25.02.2005|
Stochastic Programming E-Print Series |
|Editors:||Julie L. Higle; Werner Römisch; Surrajeet Sen|
|Complete Preprint:||pdf (urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10046379)|
|Metadata export: To export the complete metadata set as Endote or Bibtex format please click to the appropriate link.||Endnote Bibtex|
|print on demand: If you click on this icon you can order a print copy of this publication.|
|Diese Seite taggen: These icons lead to social bookmarking systems where you can create and manage personal bookmarks and discover bookmakrs of other users.|
|Determining whether a solution is of high quality (optimal or near optimal) is a fundamental question in optimization theory and algorithms. In this paper, we develop Monte Carlo sampling-based procedures for assessing solution quality in stochastic programs. Quality is defined via the optimality gap and our procedures' output is a confidence interval on this gap. We review a multiple-replications procedure that requires solution of, say, 30 optimization problems and then, we present a result that justifies a computationally simplified single-replication procedure that only requires solving one optimization problem. Even though the single replication procedure is computationally significantly less demanding, the resulting confidence interval might have low coverage probability for small sample sizes for some problems. We provide variants of this procedure that require two replications instead of one and that perform better empirically. We present computational results for a newsvendor problem and for two-stage stochastic linear programs from the literature. We also discuss when the procedures perform well an when they fail and provide preliminary guidelines for selecting a candidate solution.|
These data concerning access statistics for individual documents
have been compiled using the webserver log files aggregated by AWSTATS.
They refer to a monthly access count to the full text documents as well as to the entry page.
As for format versions of a document which consist of multiple files (such as HTML) the highest monthly access number to one of the files (chapters) is shown respectivly.
To see the detailled access numbers please move the mouse pointer over the single bars of the digaram.
Gesamtzahl der Zugriffe seit May 2011: