| edoc-Server der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |
| Publikationsart: | Buchkapitel / Aufsatz in einem Sammelband |
| Autor(en): | Olaf L. Müller |
| Titel: | From within and from without – two perspectives on analytic sentences |
| Erschienen in: |
Belief and meaning : Essays at the interface S. 229-247 |
| Herausgeber: | Wolfram Hinzen; Hans Rott |
| Verlag: |
Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften |
| Erscheinungsort: | Frankfurt, Hänsel-Hohenhausen |
| ISBN: | 1-58750-606-8, 3-8267-0025-2 |
| Erstveröffentlichung: | 31.12.2002 |
| Einreichung: | 02.04.2001 |
| Veröffentlichung auf edoc: | 21.07.2008 |
| Anmerkung: | This electronic version is not entirely identical with the original version; I have corrected here two mistakes that had occurred in the definitions (D3s) and (D3c). The original was published by Hänsel-Hohenhausen (Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt, 2002), pp. 229-247. |
| Status: |
published peer_reviewed |
| Volltext: | pdf (urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10090235) |
| Fachgebiet(e): | Naturwissenschaften ; Philosophie ; Physik ; Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik |
| Schlagwörter (eng): | Quine, Carnap, Chomsky, Ramsey, analyticity, synthetic sentences, theories, theoretical terms, Ramsification, holism, Quine-Duhem thesis, behaviorism, normativity. |
| Einrichtung: | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |
| Metadatenexport:
|
Endnote Bibtex |
| print on demand:
|
|
| Diese Seite taggen:
|
| Abstract (eng): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The analytic/synthetic distinction can be conceived from two points of view: from within or from without; from the perspective of one's own language or from the perspective of the language of others. From without, the central question is which sentences of a foreign language are to be classified as analytic. From within, by contrast, the question concerning the synthetic and the analytic acquires a normative dimension: which sentences am I not permitted to reject—if I want to avoid talking nonsense? Both perspectives on analytic sentences do not mutually exclude but supplement and illuminate each other. In "Two Dogmas", Quine's criticism of the analytic/synthetic distinction comes from within, whereas in Word and Object, Quine repeats his earlier criticism from without. His criticism is directed against Carnap's views on our understanding of theoretical terms. I challenge Quine's criticism in both of its versions and provide two definitions for analyticity that are immune to Quine's arguments. Using the first of these definitions (the one from without) I try to show how it is possible to distinguish (genuine) belief revision from linguistic change—even in case of a scientific revolution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zugriffsstatistik:
Bei Formatversionen eines Dokuments, die aus mehreren Dateien bestehen (insbesondere HTML), wird jeweils der monatlich höchste Zugriffswert auf eine der Dateien (Kapitel) des Dokuments angezeigt. Um die detaillierten Zugriffszahlen zu sehen, fahren Sie bitte mit dem Mauszeiger über die einzelnen Balken des Diagramms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gesamtzahl der Zugriffe seit Jun 2011:
|
|
| |||