Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Projekte und weitere Einrichtungen
  • Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi
  • Band 32: Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Projekte und weitere Einrichtungen
  • Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi
  • Band 32: Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Projekte und weitere Einrichtungen
  • Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi
  • Band 32: Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Projekte und weitere Einrichtungen
  • Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi
  • Band 32: Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
  • View Item
2015-12-01Buch DOI: 10.18452/17889
Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
Eberhardt, Gisela
Link, Fabian
Sommer, Marianne
Podgorny, Irina
Thornton, Amara
Delley, Géraldine
Veit, Ulrich
Bloembergen, Marieke
Eickhoff, Martijn
Wiedemann, Felix
Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi
Writing the history of archaeology has become increasingly diverse in recent years due to developments in the historiography of the sciences and the humanities. A move away from hagiography and presentations of scientifi c processes as an inevitable progression has been requested in this context. Historians of archaeolo gy have begun to utilize approved and new historio graphical concepts to trace how archaeological knowledge has been acquired as well as to refl ect on the historical conditions and contexts in which knowledge has been generated. This volume seeks to contribute to this trend. By linking theories and models with case studies from the nineteenth and twentieth century, the authors illuminate implications of communication on archaeological knowledge and scrutinize routines of early archaeological practices. The usefulness of different approaches such as narratological concepts or the concepts of habitus is thus considered.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
all.pdf — Adobe PDF — 4.662 Mb
MD5: 13db8d0636c17c6c35c133a8e3b85e48
Notes
Erscheint in der Reihe "Berlin Studies of the Ancient World" herausgegeben von Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi ; 32
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
Namensnennung - Keine kommerzielle NutzungNamensnennung - Keine kommerzielle NutzungNamensnennung - Keine kommerzielle Nutzung
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/17889
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/17889
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/17889">https://doi.org/10.18452/17889</a>