Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Fakultäten und Institute der HU
  • Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften
  • Working Papers of the Priority Programme 1859 – Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Fakultäten und Institute der HU
  • Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften
  • Working Papers of the Priority Programme 1859 – Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Fakultäten und Institute der HU
  • Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften
  • Working Papers of the Priority Programme 1859 – Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Schriftenreihen und Sammelbände
  • Fakultäten und Institute der HU
  • Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften
  • Working Papers of the Priority Programme 1859 – Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour
  • View Item
2017-07Diskussionspapier DOI: 10.18452/18132
Theories, techniques and the formation of German business cycle forecasts
Evidence from a survey among professional forecasters
Döpke, Jörg
Fritsche, Ulrich
Waldhof, Gaby
Philosophische Fakultät
The paper reports results of a survey among active forecasters of the German business cycle. Relying on 82 respondents from 37 different institutions, we investigate what models and theories forecasters subscribe to and find that they are pronounced conservative in the sense, that they overwhelmingly rely on methods and theories that have been well-established for a long time, while more recent approaches are relatively unimportant for the practice of business cycle forecasting. DSGE models are mostly used in public institutions. In line with findings in the literature there are tendencies of “leaning towards consensus” (especially for public institutions) and “sticky adjustment of forecasts” with regard to new information. We find little evidence that the behaviour of forecasters has changed fundamentally since the Great Recession but there are signs that forecast errors are evaluated more carefully. Also, a stable relationship between preferred theories and methods and forecast accuracy cannot be established. (150 words)
Files in this item
Thumbnail
SPPWP-02_2017.pdf — Adobe PDF — 15.48 Mb
MD5: c36d418cd388e7ab50886b934308ef8e
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
InCopyright
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/18132
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/18132
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/18132">https://doi.org/10.18452/18132</a>