2010Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/19379
Producing Comparability Ethnographically
Reply to Robert Prus
This short contribution is a response to Robert Prus' commentary paper "Ethnographic Comparisons, Complexities and Conceptualities.'' We agree with many of the points raised and merely reiterate three aspects of our position in order to reinforce the unique features of our notion of thick comparison: First, ethnography has an important role to play in social inquiry. Second, ethnographers appropriate fields by getting involved in them. This involvement enables the production of comparability, which we do not understand to be an inherent quality of the world. Third, producing comparability is an ongoing process at the heart of thick comparison. Its failure and limitations are productive.
Files in this item
Published first as (erstmalig folgendermaßen erschienen): Jörg Niewöhner and Thomas Scheffer: “Producing Comparability Ethnographically: Reply to Robert Prus”. In: Comparative Sociology 9.4 (2010), pages 528–536. DOI: 10.1163/156913210X12555713197213