Show simple item record

2017-05-09Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00727
Complementarity As Generative Principle: A Thought Pattern for Aesthetic Appreciations and Cognitive Appraisals in General
dc.contributor.authorBao, Yan
dc.contributor.authorvon Stosch, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorPark, Mona
dc.contributor.authorPöppel, Ernst
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-02T13:01:52Z
dc.date.available2020-03-02T13:01:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-09none
dc.date.updated2019-10-27T04:56:17Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/21985
dc.description.abstractIn experimental aesthetics the relationship between the arts and cognitive neuroscience has gained particular interest in recent years. But has cognitive neuroscience indeed something to offer when studying the arts? Here we present a theoretical frame within which the concept of complementarity as a generative or creative principle is proposed; neurocognitive processes are characterized by the duality of complementary activities like bottom-up and top-down control, or logistical functions like temporal control and content functions like perceptions in the neural machinery. On that basis a thought pattern is suggested for aesthetic appreciations and cognitive appraisals in general. This thought pattern is deeply rooted in the history of philosophy and art theory since antiquity; and complementarity also characterizes neural operations as basis for cognitive processes. We then discuss some challenges one is confronted with in experimental aesthetics; in our opinion, one serious problem is the lack of a taxonomy of functions in psychology and neuroscience which is generally accepted. This deficit makes it next to impossible to develop acceptable models which are similar to what has to be modeled. Another problem is the severe language bias in this field of research as knowledge gained in many languages over the ages remains inaccessible to most scientists. Thus, an inspection of research results or theoretical concepts is necessarily too narrow. In spite of these limitations we provide a selective summary of some results and viewpoints with a focus on visual art and its appreciation. It is described how questions of art and aesthetic appreciations using behavioral methods and in particular brain-imaging techniques are analyzed and evaluated focusing on such issues like the representation of artwork or affective experiences. Finally, we emphasize complementarity as a generative principle on a practical level when artists and scientists work directly together which can lead to new insights and broader perspectives on both sides.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights(CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 Internationalger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcomplementarityeng
dc.subjectvisual arteng
dc.subjectneuroaestheticseng
dc.subjectbrain imagingeng
dc.subjecttaxonomy of functionseng
dc.subjectmodelingeng
dc.subjectthought patterneng
dc.subjectlanguage biaseng
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologienone
dc.titleComplementarity As Generative Principle: A Thought Pattern for Aesthetic Appreciations and Cognitive Appraisals in Generalnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/21985-6
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00727none
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/21244
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleFrontiers in Psychologynone
local.edoc.pages16none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.institutionLebenswissenschaftliche Fakultätnone
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameFrontiers Media S.A.none
local.edoc.container-publisher-placeLausannenone
local.edoc.container-volume8none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
local.edoc.container-articlenumber727none
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078
local.edoc.affiliationBao, Yan; School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University Beijing, Chinanone
local.edoc.affiliationvon Stosch, Alexandra; Department “Diversity of Forms of Knowledge”, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Human Science Center, Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationPark, Mona; Human Science Center, Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationPöppel, Ernst; School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University Beijing, Chinanone

Show simple item record