Show simple item record

2017-12-04Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/21702
Aggregate Relevant Claims in Rescue Cases?
dc.contributor.authorPrivitera, Johanna
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T07:58:23Z
dc.date.available2020-08-13T07:58:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-04none
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/22418
dc.descriptionThis publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.none
dc.description.abstractIn How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims, Alex Voorhoeve suggests accommodating intuitions about duties in rescue cases by combining aggregative and non-aggregative elements into one theory. In this article, I discuss two problems Voorhoeve's theory faces as a result of requiring a cyclic pattern of choice, and argue that his attempt to solve them does not succeed.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc170 Ethik (Moralphilosophie)none
dc.titleAggregate Relevant Claims in Rescue Cases?none
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22418-6
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/21702
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.pages9none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-year2018none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
dc.identifier.eissn1741-6183
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1017/S0953820817000279
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleUtilitasnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume30none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue2none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameCambridge Univ. Pressnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceCambridgenone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart228none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend236none
bua.departmentPhilosophische Fakultätnone

Show simple item record