Zur Kurzanzeige

2019-07-01Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/22322
Do Self-Reported Traits and Aggregated States Capture the Same Thing? A Nomological Perspective on Trait-State Homomorphy
dc.contributor.authorRauthmann, John F.
dc.contributor.authorHorstmann, Kai Tobias
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Ryne A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T09:49:43Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T09:49:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01none
dc.date.updated2020-04-28T02:30:30Z
dc.identifier.issn1948-5506
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/22949
dc.description.abstractConvergent correlations between traits and state aggregates from experience sampling cannot fully establish trait-state homomorphy (the extent to which the same constructs are measured). With a nomological vector correlation and lens model approach, we test how similar nomological networks of traits and state aggregates are to each other: A trait and state-aggregate capture the same construct when both show highly similar nomological associations to a common set of correlates. In large experience sampling (N = 209) and life-logging studies (N = 298), Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness tended to show more and Openness, Honesty/Humility, and Neuroticism/Emotionality tended to show less trait-state homomorphy. However, these general findings differed somewhat at the aspect level, with Neuroticism and Extraversion aspects tending to show more versus Openness and Honesty/Humility aspects tending to show less homomorphy. The proposed nomological approaches can be flexibly applied to other traits, states, and correlates.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights(CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 Internationalger
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectnomological networkeng
dc.subjectlens modeleng
dc.subjecttraiteng
dc.subjectstateeng
dc.subjectHEXACOeng
dc.subjectBig Fiveeng
dc.subjectDIAMONDSeng
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologienone
dc.titleDo Self-Reported Traits and Aggregated States Capture the Same Thing? A Nomological Perspective on Trait-State Homomorphynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22949-4
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/22322
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.pages16none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
dc.identifier.eissn1948-5514
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1177/1948550618774772none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleSocial Psychological and Personality Sciencenone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume10none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue5none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber596-611none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSAGE Publicationsnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceLondonnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart596none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend611none
bua.import.affiliationRauthmann, John F.; Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USAnone
bua.import.affiliationHorstmann, Kai T.; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germanynone
bua.import.affiliationSherman, Ryne A.; Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USAnone
bua.departmentLebenswissenschaftliche Fakultätnone

Zur Kurzanzeige