Show simple item record

2021-02-04Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28664
Iron(III)‐tCDTA derivatives as MRI contrast agents
dc.contributor.authorXie, Jing
dc.contributor.authorHaeckel, Akvile
dc.contributor.authorHauptmann, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorRay, Iweta Pryjomska
dc.contributor.authorLimberg, Christian
dc.contributor.authorKulak, Nora
dc.contributor.authorHamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorSchellenberger, Eyk
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T12:26:23Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T12:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-04none
dc.date.updated2021-02-22T14:09:47Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/23145
dc.description.abstractPurpose Low molecular weight iron(III) complex‐based contrast agents (IBCA) including iron(III) trans‐cyclohexane diamine tetraacetic acid [Fe(tCDTA)]− could serve as alternatives to gadolinium‐based contrast agents in MRI. In search for IBCA with enhanced properties, we synthesized derivatives of [Fe(tCDTA)]− and compared their contrast effects. Methods Trans‐cyclohexane diamine tetraacetic acid (tCDTA) was chemically modified in 2 steps: first the monoanhydride of Trans‐cyclohexane diamine tetraacetic acid was generated, and then it was coupled to amines in the second step. After purification, the chelators were analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and NMR spectrometry. The chelators were complexed with iron(III), and the relaxivities of the complexes were measured at 0.94, 1.5, 3, and 7 Tesla. Kinetic stabilities of the complexes were analyzed spectrophotometrically and the redox properties by cyclic voltammetry. Results Using ethylenediamine (en) and trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane, we generated monomers and dimers of tCDTA: en‐tCDTA, en‐tCDTA‐dimer, trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane‐tCDTA, and trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane‐tCDTA‐dimer. The iron(III) complexes of these derivatives had similarly high stabilities as [Fe(tCDTA)]−. The iron(III) complexes of the trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane derivatives had higher T1 relaxivities than [Fe(tCDTA)]− that increased with increasing magnetic field strengths and were highest at 6.8 L·mmol−1·s−1 per molecule for the dimer. Remarkably, the relaxivity of [Fe(en‐tCDTA)]+ had a threefold increase from neutral pH toward pH6. Conclusion Four iron(III) complexes with similar stability in comparison to [Fe(tCDTA)]− were synthesized. The relaxivities of trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane‐tCDTA and trans‐1,4‐diaminocyclohexane‐tCDTA‐dimer complexes were in the same range as gadolinium‐based contrast agents at 3 Tesla. The [Fe(en‐tCDTA)]+ complex is a pH sensor at weakly acidic pH levels, which are typical for various cancer types.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalger
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectgadoliniumeng
dc.subjectiron chelateeng
dc.subjectiron oxide nanoparticleseng
dc.subjectlow‐molecular‐weight iron(III)‐based contrast agentseng
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingeng
dc.subjectnephrogenic systemic fibrosiseng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleIron(III)‐tCDTA derivatives as MRI contrast agentsnone
dc.typearticle
dc.subtitleIncreased T1 relaxivities at higher magnetic field strength and pH sensingnone
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/23145-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mrm.28664none
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/22527
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleMagnetic Resonance in Medicinenone
local.edoc.pages13none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.institutionMathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultätnone
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameWileynone
local.edoc.container-publisher-placeNew Yorknone
local.edoc.container-volume85
local.edoc.container-issue6
local.edoc.container-firstpage3370
local.edoc.container-lastpage3382
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
local.edoc.affiliationXie, Jing; Department of Radiology Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationHaeckel, Akvile; Department of Radiology Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationHauptmann, Ralf; Department of Radiology Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationRay, Iweta Pryjomska; Department of Chemistry Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationLimberg, Christian; Department of Chemistry Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationKulak, Nora; Institute of Chemistry Otto‐von‐Guericke‐Universität Magdeburg Magdeburg Germanynone
local.edoc.affiliationHamm, Bernd; Department of Radiology Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germanynone

Show simple item record