The Effect of Anthropomorphism and Failure Comprehensibility on Human-Robot Trust
dc.contributor.author | Roesler, Eileen | |
dc.contributor.author | Onnasch, Linda | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-18T13:21:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-18T13:21:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-09 | none |
dc.date.updated | 2021-03-08T20:23:54Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/25698 | |
dc.description.abstract | The application of anthropomorphic features to robots is generally considered to be beneficial for human- robot interaction. Although previous research has mainly focused on social robots, the phenomenon gains increasing attention in industrial human-robot interaction, as well. In this study, the impact of anthropomorphic design of a collaborative industrial robot on the dynamics of trust is examined. Participants interacted with a robot, which was either anthropomorphically or technically designed and experienced either a comprehensible or an incomprehensible fault of the robot. Unexpectedly, the robot was perceived as less reliable in the anthropomorphic condition. Additionally, trust increased after faultless experience and decreased after failure experience independently of the type of error. Even though the manipulation of the design did not result in a different perception of the robot’s anthropomorphism, it still influenced the formation of trust. The results emphasize that anthropomorphism is no universal remedy to increase trust, but highly context dependent. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | none |
dc.publisher | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject.ddc | 004 Informatik | none |
dc.title | The Effect of Anthropomorphism and Failure Comprehensibility on Human-Robot Trust | none |
dc.type | conferenceObject | |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/25698-4 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1071181320641028 | none |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/25020 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | none |
local.edoc.container-title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | none |
local.edoc.pages | 5 | none |
local.edoc.anmerkung | Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (überregionale Konsortiallizenz) frei zugänglich. | |
local.edoc.type-name | Konferenzveröffentlichung | |
local.edoc.institution | Lebenswissenschaftliche Fakultät | none |
local.edoc.container-type | series | |
local.edoc.container-type-name | Schriftenreihe | |
local.edoc.container-publisher-name | Sage | none |
local.edoc.container-publisher-place | London [u.a.] | none |
local.edoc.container-volume | 64 | none |
local.edoc.container-issue | 1 | none |
local.edoc.container-year | 2020 | none |
local.edoc.container-firstpage | 107 | none |
local.edoc.container-lastpage | 111 | none |
dc.description.version | Peer Reviewed | none |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1071-1813 |