Show simple item record

2021-07-20Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/25520
Risk in trustworthy digital repository audit and certifcation
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T13:50:32Z
dc.date.available2022-11-24T13:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-20none
dc.identifier.issn1573-7519
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10502-021-09366-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/26198
dc.description.abstractRisk is a foundational concept in digital preservation. While it has been examined from technical, economic, and organizational perspectives, I argue that it is also a social phenomenon. In this study I report on the results from 42 interviews with stakeholders in the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certifcation (TRAC) system, and analysis of documents relating to the ISO 16363 standard in order to examine how standard developers, auditors, and repository staf members understand the concept of risk for digital repositories. The results of this research demonstrate that members of these three stakeholder groups identifed risk in the TRAC audit and certifcation process in terms of specifc potential threats or sources of risk, which I have organized into fve main categories: fnance, legal, organizational governance, repository processes, and technical infrastructure. While standard developers, auditors, and repository staf generally shared an understanding of the major sources of potential risk that face digital repositories, they disagreed about whether and how these risks can be mitigated and how mitigation can be proven. Individuals who were more removed from the day-to-day work of the repositories undergoing an audit were more likely to accept well-documented risk identifcation and mitigation strategies as sufcient evidence of trustworthiness, while repository staf were skeptical that documentation was sufcient evidence of risk assessment and mitigation and thus questioned whether this would translate to actual trustworthiness for longterm digital preservation.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights(CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 Internationalger
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDigital preservationeng
dc.subjectTrustworthy digital repositorieseng
dc.subjectSocial construction of riskeng
dc.subjectTrustworthy repository audit and certifcationeng
dc.subject.ddc900 Geschichte, Geografie und Hilfswissenschaftennone
dc.titleRisk in trustworthy digital repository audit and certifcationnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/26198-1
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/25520
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleArchival sciencenone
local.edoc.pages31none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.institutionPhilosophische Fakultätnone
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameSpringer Science + Business Media B.Vnone
local.edoc.container-publisher-placeDordrecht [u.a.]none
local.edoc.container-volume22none
local.edoc.container-issue1none
local.edoc.container-firstpage43none
local.edoc.container-lastpage73none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Show simple item record