Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik | Journal of Geography Education
  • Archiv
  • 2010, Band 38 - Heft 1
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik | Journal of Geography Education
  • Archiv
  • 2010, Band 38 - Heft 1
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik | Journal of Geography Education
  • Archiv
  • 2010, Band 38 - Heft 1
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik | Journal of Geography Education
  • Archiv
  • 2010, Band 38 - Heft 1
  • View Item
2010Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/25526
Portfolio – ein Instrument für mehr Selbststeuerung im gymnasialen Geographie-Unterricht?
Empirische Ergebnisse aus dem schweizerischen Projekt APU
Schumann, Stephan
Hesske, Stefan
Eberle, Franz
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät
This article examines the effects of portfolio practice within a problem-oriented learning environment (APU) in the subject Geography. Portfolios are collections of students’ own learning products, such as papers, presentations etc. The use of portfolios was aimed at fostering students’ self-regulated learning competencies, particularly with regard to learning strategies and motivation. The study took place between August 2006 and February 2008 in Swiss high schools (higher secondary education, 10th-11th form) with a total of 102 students. Data were collected with standardized questionnaires at four different measurements within a quasi-experimental design. In line with the expectations, the analyses show moderate to strong effects for several indicators relating to the learning environment itself, as well as a substantial increase of portfolio acceptance during the intervention. However, no significant differences in students’ capacities for self-regulation were observed. We assume that students would need to work with portfolios for a longer period of time to make significant gains in the areas of learning strategies and motivation.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
ZGD-38-1-SchumannHesskeEberle.pdf — Adobe PDF — 929.7 Kb
MD5: becbedfc9e6f3dff5eca4bacb40d82d8
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/25526
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/25526
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/25526">https://doi.org/10.18452/25526</a>