Show simple item record

2021-12-18Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/26404
Dementia care and the role of guideline adherence in primary care: cross-sectional findings from the DemTab study
dc.contributor.authorLech, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorO’Sullivan, Julie L.
dc.contributor.authorDrewelies, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Wolfram
dc.contributor.authorSpang, Robert P.
dc.contributor.authorVoigt-Antons, Jan-Niklas
dc.contributor.authorNordheim, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorGellert, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T12:11:05Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T12:11:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-18none
dc.date.updated2023-03-28T00:17:48Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/27087
dc.description.abstractBackground General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the care of people with dementia (PwD). However, the role of the German Dementia Guideline in primary care remains unclear. The main objective of the present study was to examine the role of guideline-based dementia care in general practices. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the DemTab study was conducted. Descriptive analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics for GPs (N = 28) and PwD (N = 91) were conducted. Adherence to the German Dementia Guideline of GPs was measured at the level of PwD. Linear Mixed Models were used to analyze the associations between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and GP factors at individual (age, years of experience as a GP, frequency of utilization of guideline, perceived usefulness of guideline) and structural (type of practice, total number of patients seen by a participating GP, and total number of PwD seen by a participating GP) levels as well as between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and PwD’s quality of life. Results Self-reported overall adherence of GPs was on average 71% (SD = 19.4, range: 25–100). Adherence to specific recommendations varied widely (from 19.2 to 95.3%) and the majority of GPs (79.1%) reported the guideline as only partially or somewhat helpful. Further, we found lower adherence to be significantly associated with higher numbers of patients (γ10 = − 5.58, CI = − 10.97, − 0.19, p = .04). No association between adherence to the guideline and PwD’s quality of life was found (γ10 = −.86, CI = − 4.18, 2.47, p = .61). Conclusion The present study examined the role of adherence to the German Dementia Guideline recommendations in primary care. Overall, GPs reported high levels of adherence. However, major differences across guideline recommendations were found. Findings highlight the importance of guidelines for the provision of care. Dementia guidelines for GPs need to be better tailored and addressed. Further, structural changes such as more time for PwD may contribute to a sustainable change of dementia care in primary care. Trial registration The DemTab trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (3093)
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.rights(CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 Internationalger
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDementiaeng
dc.subjectPrimary careeng
dc.subjectAdherence to dementia guidelineeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleDementia care and the role of guideline adherence in primary care: cross-sectional findings from the DemTab studynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/27087-6
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18452/26404
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.pages12none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2318
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1186/s12877-021-02650-8none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleBMC geriatricsnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume21none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber717none
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameBioMed Centralnone
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceLondonnone
bua.departmentLebenswissenschaftliche Fakultätnone

Show simple item record