Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • kunsttexte.de - E-Journal für Kunst- und Bildgeschichte
  • Kunst Design Alltag
  • Ausgabe 3.2016 / Kunst Design Alltag
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • kunsttexte.de - E-Journal für Kunst- und Bildgeschichte
  • Kunst Design Alltag
  • Ausgabe 3.2016 / Kunst Design Alltag
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • kunsttexte.de - E-Journal für Kunst- und Bildgeschichte
  • Kunst Design Alltag
  • Ausgabe 3.2016 / Kunst Design Alltag
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • kunsttexte.de - E-Journal für Kunst- und Bildgeschichte
  • Kunst Design Alltag
  • Ausgabe 3.2016 / Kunst Design Alltag
  • View Item
2016-10-01Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/7390
Exhibiting Exhibiting
documenta 12 as a Meta-Exhibition
Buurman, Nanne
Since the so-called ‘curatorial turn’ in the 1990s, curators are discussed as new paradigmatic authors in the art field. Discussions about curatorial authorship first gained momentum in the late 1960s, when curating was no longer merely regarded as a museological backstage profession but increasingly also meant organizing exhibitions and conceiving of other art events on a freelance basis. The topos of the curator as a meta-artist was popularized by Daniel Buren in his critique of Harald Szeemann’s auctorial stance at documenta 5, in which he complained that individual artworks were reduced to the status of mere dots of color in a curatorial Gesamtkunstwerk. It has since been used time and again by critics who felt that curators were willfully misusing exhibitions as their own works of art, thereby illegitimately interfering with artists’ intentions. As a practice that implies selecting and commissioning artworks to put them in relation with one another and with the surrounding material and social contexts, curating, however, always necessarily implies creating complex multidimensional constellations - even if this meta-mediality is repressed in the ‘White Cube’ (Brian O’Doherty). My contribution considers documenta 12 (2007) as a critical intervention into the ways in which authorship is generally constructed as an individual agency. Resembling the move from ‘Work to Frame’ (Craig Owens) that has been performed by various waves of artistic institutional critique, artistic director Roger M. Buergel and chief curator Ruth Noack produced a show which shifted the focus away from artists and curators as sole authors and instead exhibited the exhibition as a medium in which different agencies contribute to decentered processes of meaning-making. To demonstrate how documenta 12 called attention to the ways in which exhibitions shape perception and produce narratives, this text provides a close reading of the exhibition’s design, architecture, labeling, publications and public programming. It discusses how by radically breaking with the convention of the White Cube, documenta 12 (re)appropriated a variety of methodologies and strategies that have formerly been used by artists such as Daniel Buren, Dan Graham, Gerwald Rockenschaub, and Louise Lawler in their exposure of the ‘powers of display’ (Mary Anne Staniszewski). As an exhibition of the exhibition, documenta 12 has to be considered in terms that go beyond the notion of the ‘hyperimage’ in so far as it took into account not only the intentional combination of images by collectors, art historians and artists that Felix Thürlemann adresses in his book but also provided meta-medial reflections of exhibitions as complex infrastructural constellations and social spaces. Thus, documenta 12 called into question the very notion of individual authorship that is a focal point of Thürlemann’s discussion of the hyperimage.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
buurman.pdf — Adobe PDF — 1.424 Mb
MD5: ebf96a33b1e7414551873cb8eccdeeae
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
InCopyright
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/7390
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/7390
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/7390">https://doi.org/10.18452/7390</a>