Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Stochastic Programming E-print Series (SPEPS)
  • Volume 1999
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Stochastic Programming E-print Series (SPEPS)
  • Volume 1999
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Stochastic Programming E-print Series (SPEPS)
  • Volume 1999
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • Stochastic Programming E-print Series (SPEPS)
  • Volume 1999
  • View Item
2000-01-20Buch DOI: 10.18452/8224
A Dynamic Asset Allocation Model with Downside Risk Control
Zhao, Yonggan
Ziemba, William T.
This paper presents a new stochastic model for investment. The investor's objective is to maximize the expected growth rate while controlling for downside risk. Assuming lognormally distributed prices, the strategy that determines the o optimal dynamic portfolio weights by changing risk neutral excess rate is determined by a stochastic differential equation. The maximum loss can be limited almost surely. A constrained optimization model is developed given investors' preference on the minimum subsistence reward among all possible scenarios. The relative changes in the expected terminal wealth, minimum subsistence and the risk aversion are studied. Taking VaR as the risk measure, the return/risk tradeoff efficient frontier is constructed. A comparison of the downside risk control model for a typical example to Buy and Hold (BH) and Fixed Mix (FM) strategic asset allocation models shows that the downside risk control model has superior performance in the return/VaR framework.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
8.pdf — Adobe PDF — 296.4 Kb
MD5: cb300d404888a9425bcdc4f4fbe71d9f
8.ps — Postscript — 343.0 Kb
MD5: 9c7699a70b942dde75bdc68e4e2406ef
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
InCopyright
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/8224
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/8224
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/8224">https://doi.org/10.18452/8224</a>