Logo of Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinLogo of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
edoc-Server
Open-Access-Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität
de|en
Header image: facade of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • UMAC Journal
  • University Museums and Collections Journal 4/2011
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • UMAC Journal
  • University Museums and Collections Journal 4/2011
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • UMAC Journal
  • University Museums and Collections Journal 4/2011
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Elektronische Zeitschriften
  • UMAC Journal
  • University Museums and Collections Journal 4/2011
  • View Item
2012-01-16Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.18452/8710
Human remains in museum collections and their restitution to the communities: Museum of La Plata – Argentina
Cordero, Graciela Weisinger
Maza, María Del Carmen
The intention of this article is to reflect on the challenges that museums face when collections include the human remains of indigenous communities. To debate the topic, the Museum of La Plata is used as an example. Part of the collection concerns the final stage of the "Conquest of the Desert" epoch in which the army caught the last chiefs and a group of indigenous – elders, women and children – who still were resisting the offensive in Junín of the Andes. The museum held captive the living aborigines for their study until September 1894. In Argentina, the first claims to the authorities of the university museum of La Plata were registered by the mid 80s. To date, the museum has repatriated the remains of a Tehuelche chief (1994) and a Ranquel chief (2001) to their communities. The problem of the repatriation of human remains, as well as the cultural objects associated with them, is an attempt to allow these diverse aboriginal communities to manage their own cultural inheritance in the manner that they deem most appropriate. Bringing ethical principles into play, they recover their cultural identity. It also addresses the bases upon which the anthropologic science constructed its ‘object of study’: the appropriation of fragments of the human reality to investigate and display them in exhibitions and museums. However, the demands by the different indigenous communities for the return of their ancestors are increasing. This has caused a division in the scientific community with some agreeing in the matter of repatriation, while others see the remains as belonging to the museums and that if they are repatriated they will then be lost to scientific research.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
weisinger-cordero.pdf — Adobe PDF — 2.327 Mb
MD5: fcac2f974c2895c0652ec85d73ed5c27
39075_xml.zip — Unknown — 324.1 Kb
MD5: d130eea0d38a82a1592fbe95ac3954bf
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
InCopyright
Details
DINI-Zertifikat 2019OpenAIRE validatedORCID Consortium
Imprint Policy Contact Data Privacy Statement
A service of University Library and Computer and Media Service
© Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
 
DOI
10.18452/8710
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.18452/8710
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18452/8710">https://doi.org/10.18452/8710</a>